“The concept of disease is fast replacing the concept of responsibility. With increasing zeal Americans use and interpret the assertion “I am sick” as equivalent to the assertion “I am not responsible”: Smokers say they are not responsible for smoking, drinkers that they are not responsible for drinking, gamblers that they are not responsible for gambling, and mothers who murder their infants that they are not responsible for killing. To prove their point — and to capitalize on their self-destructive and destructive behavior — smokers, drinkers, gamblers, and insanity acquitees are suing tobacco companies, liquor companies, gambling casinos, and physicians.” ―
Addiction does not meet the criteria specified for a core disease entity
“Addiction does not meet the criteria specified for a core disease entity, namely the presence of a primary measurable deviation from physiologic or anatomical norm. Addiction is self-acquired and is not transmissible, contagious, autoimmune, hereditary, degenerative or traumatic. Treatment consists of little more than stopping a given behaviour. True diseases worsen if left untreated. A patient with cancer is not cured if locked in a cell, whereas an alcoholic is automatically cured. No access to alcohol means no alcoholism. A person with schizophrenia will not remit if secluded. Sepsis will spread and Parkinson disease will worsen if left untreated. Criminal courts do not hand down verdicts of “not guilty by virtue of mental illness” to drunk drivers who kill pedestrians.” (2012. Tim Holden. Accessed, Dec. 20, 2017 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3314045/)
Moreover, the “disease model of addiction” advocates for “epiphenomenalism which posits that “our thoughts and our behaviour are caused by brain activity, BUT what we think has no effect on our behaviour or on the activity of the brain. Essentially, this philosophy completely rejects free-will at both the level of thought and action. From this view, brain activity simply happens as part of a fully physically determined chain of cause and effect—the brain develops in certain ways according to genetics and conditioning, and just reacts chemically, producing thoughts and behaviours over which we have only an illusion of control. Or, as researcher Edwin Locke put it: A more common ‘soft’ materialist view of thought is that, although thoughts exist, they are epiphenomena of physical events, that is, by-products of the physical having no causal efficacy. The doctrine of epiphenomenalism, of course, is a version of determinism, or more precisely, psychological determinism. This doctrine holds that with respect to his beliefs, thoughts, decisions and actions, human beings have no choice. Given the conditions of his environment and his genes at any given time, only one alternative is possible. In sum, human beings have no control over their destiny; they are totally controlled by conditioning and physiology. (Locke, 1995) (2014. STEVEN SLATE. Accessed Dec. 20, 2017 http://www.thecleanslate.org/philosophical-brain-disease-addiction-epiphenomenalism/).
By medicalizing addiction, addicts have been turned into political, social and economic fodder for policy makers
In the 1940’s, if you were an alcoholic, you could go to a hospital and safely detox, however you were required to pay a bill for your stay, which was approximately 5 to 7 days. There was no money in the procedure of “drying out” drunks and addicts. BUT, by medicalizing addiction and defining it as a disease has opened the door for social policy makers to justify a huge infrastructure of social services and, of course a whole army of social workers, addiction counsellors, and harm-reduction specialists to work on the growing problem of addiction. Furthermore, medicalizing addictions has given rise to the multi-billion dollar treatment centre industry. It has also spawned the further rise of “Big Pharma” and their plethora of pharmaceutical interventions to augment the addict’s plight. And let us no forget Government sponsored methadone programs and safe-injection sites for heroine addicts. Sadly, talk with any heroine addict and ask them about the horrors of trying to detox from methadone addiction, all courtesy of our enabling government sanctioned social services agencies.
“Medicalizing addiction has not led to any management advances at the individual level. The need for helping or treating people with addictions is not in doubt, but a social problem requires social interventions.” (2012. Tim Holden. Accessed, Dec. 20, 2017 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3314045/)
Twelve Step Program describes alcoholism/addiction as an allergy of the body, an obsession of the mind, — a spiritual malady
Nowhere in the “Big Book,” Alcoholics Anonymous (2001, 4th ed.), the Twelve Step basic recovery text does it subscribe to the notion of alcoholism as a “disease”
However the “Big Book” of Alcoholics Anonymous does state:
“The doctor’s theory that we have an allergy to alcohol interests us. As laymen, our opinion as to its soundness may, of course, mean little. But as exproblem drinkers, we can say that his explanation makes good sense. It explains many things for which we cannot otherwise account.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.xxvi)
“An illness of this sort and we have come to believe it an illness involves those about us in a way no other human sickness can. (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.18)
“Men and women drink essentially because they like the effect produced by alcohol. The sensation is so elusive that, while they admit it is injurious, they cannot after a time differentiate the true from the false. To them, their alcoholic life seems the only normal one. They are restless, irritable and discontented, unless they can again experience the sense of ease and comfort which comes at once by taking a few drinks–drinks which they see others taking with impunity. After they have succumbed to the desire again, as so many do, and the phenomenon of craving develops, they pass through the well-known stages of a spree, emerging remorseful, with a firm resolution not to drink again. This is repeated over and over, and unless this person can experience an entire psychic change there is very little hope of his recovery.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.xxviii)
“…there was always the curious mental phenomenon that parallel with our sound reasoning there inevitably ran some insanely trivial excuse for taking the first drink. Our sound reasoning failed to hold us in check. The insane idea won out. Next day we would ask ourselves, in all earnestness and sincerity, how it could have happened.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.37)
The untreated alcoholic/addict is a manifestation of varying degrees of irresponsibility.
“Selfishness, self-centeredness! That, we (Alcoholics Anonymous) think, is the root of the alcoholic’s troubles…So our troubles, we think, are basically of our own making. They arise out of ourselves, and the alcoholic is an extreme example of self-will run riot, though he usually doesn’t think so.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.62).
Alcoholics Anonymous advocates a spiritual-moral solution to the problem of alcoholism and addiction.
Through the Step Four process, the alcoholic uncovers their short-comings, their character defects. Examples of those defects can be found throughout the first 164 pages of the “Big Book,” here are some that are cited: “pride, vanity, egotistical, self-pity, morbidness, jealousy, suspicion, envy, selfishness, self-seeking, self-centeredness, self-justification, insincerity, dishonesty, lying, exaggeration, unthinking, callousness, cruelty, anger, rancor, bitterness, hate, antipathy, lethargy, impatience, fear, cowardice, worry, intolerance, lust, infidelity, inconsideration, anti-social, slander, gossip, prejudice, diffidence, servility, scraping, irresponsibility, unreasonableness, apathy, martyrdom, squandering, and obstinacy.”
These character defects are the underlying root causes and conditions that produce symptoms of this spiritual malady recognized as restless, irritable and discontented, boredom, depression, anxiety, etc.
These symptoms produce a mental mind-set in the alcoholic to causes them to seek a sense of ease and comfort which comes at once from alcohol/drugs and leads, thus them to picking up the first drink (even when they don’t really want to) which, when coupled with their physical allergy to alcohol, leads to the “alcoholic spree,” whereby they seemingly have no control over their consumption.
The Alcoholics Anonymous program states, “There is a solution.” “When the spiritual malady is overcome, we straighten out mentally and physically.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.64)
A key tenet to the Twelve Step solution is Step Three: “Made a decision to turn our will (our thinking) and our lives (our actions) over to the care of God (the ‘Great Reality’ we find deep down within ourselves) as we understood Him.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.59)
This essentially means that the alcoholic is going think and live by a new set of spiritual principles. Character defects are correlated with the spiritual malady which produces and general disposition of restlessness, discontentedness, irritability, boredom, etc. and leads to the mental obsession which inevitably leads to the first drink and subsequent spree. Spiritual principles are correlated with arresting the symptoms of the malady, thus allowing the alcoholic’s mind and body to straighten out and recover from a seemingly hopeless state of mind and body. This is all accomplished by the alcoholic working all Twelve Steps which facilitates a spiritual experience or awakening.
A Daily Plan of Action
“On awakening let us think about the twenty-four hours ahead. We consider our plans for the day. Before we begin, we ask God to direct our thinking, especially asking that it be divorced from self-pity, dishonest or self-seeking motives (character defects). Under these conditions we can employ our mental faculties with assurance, for after all God gave us brains to use. Our thought- life will be placed on a much higher plane when our thinking is cleared of wrong motives.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.86)
“When we retire at night, we constructively review our day. Were we resentful, selfish, dishonest or afraid? Do we owe an apology? Have we kept something to ourselves which should be discussed with another person at once? Were we kind and loving toward all? What could we have done better? Were we thinking of ourselves most of the time? Or were we thinking of what we could do for others, of what we could pack into the stream of life? But we must be careful not to drift into worry, remorse or morbid reflection, for that would diminish our usefulness to others. After making our review we ask God’s forgiveness and inquire what corrective measures should be taken.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.86)
“We are not cured of alcoholism. What we really have is a daily reprieve contingent on the maintenance of our spiritual condition. Every day is a day when we must carry the vision of God’s will into all of our activities. “How can I best serve Thee, Thy will (not mine) be done.” These are thoughts which must go with us constantly. We can exercise our will power along this line all we wish. It is the proper use of the will.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.85)
The efficacy of the Twelve Step Program
“On the other hand–and strange as this may seem to those who do not understand–once a psychic change has occurred, the very same person who seemed doomed, who had so many problems he despaired of ever solving them, suddenly finds himself easily able to control his desire for alcohol, the only effort necessary being that required to follow a few simple rules.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p. xxix).
“Life will take on new meaning. To watch people recover, to see them help others, to watch loneliness vanish, to see a fellowship grow up about you, to have a host of friends — this is an experience you must not miss. We know you will not want to miss it. Frequent contact with newcomers and with each other is the bright spot of our lives.” (2001. A.A. 4th ed. p.89)
Lastly, tens of thousands of recoveries throughout the decades, since 1939, in the rooms of A.A., C.A., N.A. and so many other Twelve Step oriented fellowships, bares witness to the efficacy of the Twelve Step Program.
In conclusion, we find that alcoholism/addiction is not a disease but a spiritual malady. A malady that can be remedied with a simple, moral-spiritual approach, as instructed in the text of the Big Book of Alcoholics Anonymous.
Post Script:
Disease is something that needs to be cured. Illness is something that needs to be managed.
Traditionally trained medical doctors are trained to treat diseases. They are trained basically in surgery and medicine which is aimed at curing some abnormal condition in a bodily organ or tissue.
Comparison Table Between Illness and Disease
Parameters of Comparison | Illness | Disease |
Definition | Illness is an inability to function in a healthy way for prolonged periods. | The Disease is a condition or disorder of any body structure and function. |
Manifestation | It does not cause any specific manifestation of a known cause. | It causes specific manifestation and has a known cause. |
Remedy | It can be cured by an individual on their own. | Requires professional care and medicaments. |
Death-Dealing | The Illness is not death-dealing. | The Disease can be death-dealing. |
Illustration | Bacterial infection, depression, inflammation, stress, and anxiety. | Hepatitis A, Salmonella poisoning, Lyme disease, cancer, and AIDS. |
“Alcoholics Anonymous advocates a spiritual-moral solution to the problem of alcoholism and addiction.”
Really? In truth A.A. has no opinion on outside issues such as addiction. Good stuff in this article, but obviously written by someone connected with the “industry”.
I wrote this article and I’m just a lay alcoholic addict. Cameron F.
Re ‘Disease’ Bill did not like to use it and nor do I- but he did mention it according to Bill Dotson on page 191 Third Edition in Bill Dotson’s story – Anonymous Number 3. It is a great quote too. I personally prefer ‘Dis – ease’ or ill at ease, because it makes more sense, but I digress. The main problem centres in the mind – Mental ‘illness’ plus Physical craving/allergy the problem is removed with a Spiritual Solution.
Oh my goodness. Obviously you don’t grasp the concept
You obviously have not read this article since your comment is vague and lacks any kind of critical thinking.
Thomas Szasz (1920-2012) maintained that, unlike true diseases of the brain and body, mental illness is a destructive social construct that medicalizes living and deprives people of their dignity. According to Szasz, medication, hospitalization and mandated psychotherapy are little more than coercive, dignity-reducing forms of clinical practice. You will be jarred away from comfortable notions to embrace deeper psychiatric and social justice issues underscoring your clinical practice.
Many people value security and submission over uncertainty and responsibility. For our clients, this means abdicating control over their lives to the authority of their symptoms and doctors; while for clinicians it compels belief in mental illness as a disease to be cured. Dr. Szasz will challenge you to open deeper conversations with your clients around freedom and to question the potentially coercive nature inherent in psychotherapy and psychopharmacology.
True freedom means taking control of and responsibility for our choices and their consequences. Neither psychotherapy, drugs, nor the power of our techniques will restore a client’s personal sense of agency. Szasz will cause you to feel uncomfortable enough to think differently about everything you do clinically, from diagnosis to treatment planning, especially with the most vulnerable—children, the imprisoned and the so-called mentally ill. Szasz’s ideas were highly controversial during his lifetime, and they continue to fuel critical discourse around topics as seemingly divergent as the DSM and legalization of drugs.
Thank for your post i appreciate it and i agree. Yes we suffer pitiful and incomprehensible demoralization after taking a drink and thus the phenominon of craving and the obsession of the mind are set in motion and we have no defense against taking the next drink ……our defense “must”, come from a higher power spiritual in nature if ” WE” are to recover from a seemingly hopeless state of MIND and BODY … if the sober process suggested in the Big Book of AA is to work.
I believe the Big book was a devinely insired gift to Bill and Bob ( first 100 ) hopefully the Preface, Foreward(s), appendicies, first 164 pages the basic text will not be altered. As i started my Journey in recovery in 2000 i REALIZED ( the fog was clearing) the book does not have to change [ but i do.]…i belive to take away or edit, modify the book is a literal slap in the face to the people that sat down and wrote it a book that would have a shared truth.
Is darkness lack of light ? or is light lack of darkness ? ………..where does thought come from …..?
The old timers use to call “Alcoholism”, a dis-ease of that chaos manufacturing plant Ego- ago- go……maybe it is. Sometimes i wonder if i am out of Step? OR just the whole army? I am looking for Humility somebody have directions?
Have a look at Dr Kevin McCauley on YouTube explain why he believes addiction is a disease. I get so frustrated with this “Spiritual Malady” concept – what do you actually explain with this? I believe I suffered from a physical addiction arising from my alcohol use over time, my alcohol use was due to mental and emotional stressors arising from unmet needs and incorrect learning or conditioning in my formative years which left me feeling worthless and hopeless. The more I used alcohol to deal with life the sicker mentally, emotionally I became. This left me spiritually bereft which means I had low self esteem and worth in my own eyes. For me it has nothing to do with a God or religion. A power greater than myself was the group of alcoholics that taught me what an alcoholic was and gave me hope that I could recover from my hopeless condition. I am now 42 years sober.
Obsessive compulsive disorder is a disease that has a behavioral element to it. Is that not a disease? Is physical addiction to cigarettes a disease? How about hoarding so bad is destroys your home? How about narcissistic personality disorder? Addiction can overlap. While “disease” sounds like a cop-out for addictions, the way the body and neurology operate clearly is a disease with symptoms, a progression, a departure from a healthy state, is diagnosable, is treatable.
It is a disease from the viewpoint:
It has symptoms.
It has a progression of the illness that gets worse.
The underlying cause and symptoms are different.
A diagnosis can be made.
It can be treated by going to the cause. Treating the symptoms does not treat the underlying reason. Treating the actual cause is what leads to the cure.
One problem with science and psychologists is that they’ve learned much about addictions but still don’t understand the treatment that bypasses all that helpless information and instead goes to the underlying cause.
I personally agree with the assay written above and below is a quote from the 1960 National Clergy Conference on Alcoholism from Bill W which supports this;
“Father X.: Bill, I noticed that in your talk you did not use the word ‘disease.’ Did you intend to make any kind of distinction between disease and sickness?
Bill W.: We have never called alcoholism a disease because, technically speaking, it is not a disease entity. For example, there is no such thing as heart disease. Instead, there are many separate heart ailments or combinations of them. It is something like that with alcoholism. Therefore, we did not wish to get in wrong with the medical profession by pronouncing alcoholism a disease entity. Hence we have always called it an illness or a malady – a far safer term for us to use.”
Why this ready acceptance of the word “disease” within AA?
There is one line in the Big Book on page 64; From it stem all forms of spiritual “disease”, and again from the 12 x 12 page 150, Tradition 5 – Alcoholics Anonymous can be likened to a group of physicians who might find a cure for cancer, and upon whose concerted work would depend the answer for sufferers of this “disease”.
The word “disease” is taken out of context and used as “evidence” by some within the fellowship, that AA does in fact call it a disease. “I have a 3-fold disease”, “my disease” or “this disease” is repeated in many shares, can be found in the stories, in Grapevine articles, AA blogs, at conventions, and is peppered throughout AA literature. (Plant a seed, give it water, and all of a sudden it becomes the truth). Consequently, the singular word “Disease” appears to be widely accepted within our membership.
I personally do not use the word “disease” in my shares, as I try to carry the right information when sharing and sponsoring, that being we suffer from a spiritual malady which only a spiritual experience will conquer.
Thank you for the article – I often share it with others when the opportunity arises.
What matters most is “does the programme work” whether it is genetic, hereditary or does not, is not something that an alcoholic fed up with the fact that their behaviour causing shame, embarrassment and resentment in their families, at work and in society, they will be more concerned about getting relief their actions and will not be engaging in an argument about whether it is a disease or not. It should be remembered that science has not found an answer in the last 86 years that provides an alternative to the AA programme.
AA is NOT the “only” cure for alcoholism. It is NOT a disease, an allergy, nor is it inherited through family genes. It is a human weakness, lack of self-respect, laziness, and an excuse for being intellectually-morally-spiritually DEAD because of training/learning in ones childhood.
Are you an alcoholic yourself?
Recovered or otherwise?
First of all, the notion of the Big Book, an 80 year old text written by a layperson who himself was only about 3 years sober at the time of writing it, as somehow being the “final authority” on alcoholism/addiction is a mistake. There are certainly some things Bill Wilson mentioned in the Big Book that have proven to be true however, 80 years later we know far more about alcoholism, brain chemistry, metabolism etc.Secondly, the author claims there’s no genetic/hereditary component which is a false statement. Whether alcoholism is hereditary or not has not been concluded. There does appear to be a case to be made for genetics (about 79% of alcoholics “seem to have” a genetic link) but the specific gene has not yet been identified. The jury’s still out on this
My brain has been imprinted, etched or marked by my misuse of alcohol. That explains to me the disease or allergy explanation of addiction. That explanation, however, does not explain my ‘ism’ or my extreme self-will that leaves my thoughts in constant motion and mental fatigue or even mental pain.
“An illness of this sort-and we have come to believe it an illness-involves those about us in a way no other human sickness can. If a person has cancer all are sorry for him and no one is angry or hurt. But not so with the alcoholic illness, for with it there goes annihilation of all the things worth while in life.”(Alcoholics Anonymous 2nd edition pg.18)
Even after several decades without a drink or any other mood altering chemical in my body I am at a loss as to how my illness came about so many years ago. Newsflash: It really doesn’t matter. I am not responsible for my illness but I am responsible for my recovery.
It doesn’t matter how the jackass got in the ditch- just get him out. I’ve been out of the ditch of alcoholism for many years and I am eternally grateful to the men who showed me “How to get out and stay out”. I have tried to help others find their way through this path of 12 steps. That’s my responsibility for having been given the gift.
I fully support the premise of this essay. In short I find the disease model absolves personal responsibility. How can we recover and move towards a constructive future if we are stuck in the disease of addiction. I believe I suffer from an illness that is understood to be a spiritual malady. If I stay in fit spiritual condition all is well.